|
1. Business Investment in Capital Assets Expected to Grow in 2005
Forecasters predict that business investment will expand in 2005, but at slower pace than 2004. Because the economy now has positive momentum, it should provide substantial opportunities for lessors and lenders to finance and lease capital assets, including business aircraft, rail equipment, healthcare assets, technology assets and heavy trucks.
Business investment is an important and volatile component of overall spending in the U.S. economy. It represents about 10 percent of the U.S.
gross domestic product (GDP). Economists indicate that the volatility associated with business investment will be even more evident in reports on 2004 and 2005. The extra volatility may occur in part as a result of the expected shift of business investments from 2005 into 2004 by companies that rushed to use
bonus depreciation before its expiration date last year. See:
Ringing In the New Year with an Investment Bust, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Dec. 2004).
*Tip:
Bonus depreciation expired on December 31, 2004 for most assets other than certain aircraft. The rules require a close reading to determine the eligibility of an asset for bonus depreciation in 2005.
According to
Global Insight, Inc., an economic information company, the economy should expand more slowly this year. It suggests:
The pace of this slowdown is being set by the United States and China, where monetary policy is gradually becoming tighter and, in the case of the United States, fiscal stimulus has come to an end. However, this "downshift" in the global economy has been more pronounced … mostly because of higher oil prices. Moreover, … faltering growth in some industrialized economies—Germany, France, Japan—in the third quarter could be the start of a more problematic downturn. Nevertheless, in Global Insight's view …[w]hile the U.S. and Chinese economies will slow, growth in these economies will continue at a reasonable pace.
The U.S. economy is in the midst of a deceleration that will take year-over-year real GDP growth from 5.0% at the start of 2004 to 3.0% by the end of 2005. Rising interest rates, strained household finances, the end of tax cuts, and persistently high energy costs are now restraining economic growth…On the positive side, double-digit gains in capital spending… suggest that businesses have gained confidence in the expansion's sustainability.
For more world economic analysis, see:
The World Economy: Headed for a Slowdown or a Slump? by Nariman Behravesh, Global Insight (Nov. 22, 2004).
Capital Spending: An Engine of Growth in 2005
Global Insight asserts that capital spending has become one of the engines of the U.S. recovery fueled by record growth in corporate profits and cash flow. It expects the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates five times to reach a federal funds rate of 3.5 percent by the end of 2005. It also believes taxes will increase as the pressure by financial markets (especially the currency and bond markets) mounts to halt rising budget deficits, potentially foiling any plan to make existing tax cuts permanent. See:
Top-Ten Economic Predictions for 2005, by Nariman Behravesh, Global Insight (Dec. 9, 2004).
*Tip: Higher interest rates and taxes generally encourage
true tax leasing. In tax leases, lessors can transfer to lessees the benefit of depreciation deductions and thereby lower the lessee’s rent and after-tax cost of capital.
Reporting in October 2004 on its recent
survey results, the National Association for Business Economics confirmed that capital spending remains strong but is softening slightly. Focusing on the year from about October 2004 to October 2005, a majority of its respondents said that they would increase the capital spending at their firms. Similarly, manufacturing and
durable goods production should remain firm and show moderate growth in 2005. See: Manufacturing Growth Stays Firm, by Michael Schroeder, The Wall Street Journal (S.W. Ed.), Page A:2 (Dec. 24, 2004). On a brighter note, the
Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported recently that economic activity in the manufacturing sector grew in December 2004 for the 19th consecutive month, while the overall economy grew for the 38th consecutive month.
Orders of commercial equipment and computers also grew in December. See:
December Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®, Institute for Supply Management (Jan. 3, 2005). ISM expects the positive momentum to carry into 2005.
In a survey of chief financial officers (CFOs), Bank of America Business Capital found that CFOs believe the economy will expand in 2005, but less than half of them expect manufacturing will grow this year. See:
2005 CFO Outlook: Bullish On Economy, Less Optimistic About Manufacturing Sector, CapitalEyes,
Bank of America Business Capital (Dec. 2004).
Predictions for Deal Flow in 2005: A Review of Select Capital Assets
Though the big picture for the economy seems generally favorable for 2005, a closer look at specific asset types reveals a mixed bag of potential deal flow for acquisitions, leasing and financing. According to the
Bank of America CFO Outlook: "[T]he top three types of financing CFOs plan to use are bank financing (72 percent), internal sources (65 percent) and leasing (37 percent). The money raised will go into machinery and equipment (cited by 36 percent), expansion (the choice of 28 percent) and working capital (picked by 24 percent)."
*Comment: It’s interesting to note that CFOs plan to rely on leasing for 37 percent of their financing needs. Yet public statements about leasing often indicate that
80 percent of businesses lease equipment. This wide gulf between the 37 percent and 80 percent usage of leasing may create a question of whether the penetration rate and/or desirability of leasing in the market has dropped significantly for the responding CFOs.
While many different assets deserve attention, the following discrete asset types illustrate important elements of the capital financing requirements of U.S. and multinational companies:
Business Aircraft.
While business aviation has a potential for dynamic growth in 2005, current volume of new large cabin aircraft is low. However, volume should improve later this year because
manufacturers have substantial backlogs for new aircraft. The number of used aircraft available for transactions has declined, but 80 percent of used aircraft are over 10-years old—a less desirable age for financing and an unlikely alternative to acquiring new aircraft. Fractional shares showed a 10 percent improvement over last year, and experienced a hot year-end in 2004. See:
UBS Investment Research, December Business Jet Update (Dec. 2004). For whole aircraft, incremental new customers may be needed to expand the number of large-ticket aircraft deals. Finding these customers will be a difficult challenge because the 2005 market lacks any resemblance to the surge of buyers and lessees that occurred as a result of the technology boom in the late 1990s. Margin pressure on loan and lease pricing for the few aircraft deals requiring financing seems to be persistent. New entrants and existing players in business aviation finance may compound this pressure if they continue to close transactions on aggressive terms and pricing. See:
Dynamic Growth Projected For Business Aircraft
by David G. Mayer, Business Leasing News (Dec. 2004).
*Prediction: In 2005, business aviation leasing, financing and acquisitions will remain highly competitive, expand slowly and offer a low number of transactions for new whole aircraft and under 10-year old, used aircraft
relative to the lessors and lenders able and ready to finance deals. Fractional shares and 25-hour aircraft jet cards have real lift, and should have a strong 2005. Look for 2006 and beyond to see business aviation deals take flight.
Technology Assets. Information
Technology (IT) spending represents over $1 trillion in worldwide investment. The sector consists of hardware, telecommunications equipment, IT services, semiconductors, electronic manufacturing services (EMS) and distributors. Services represent approximately 50 percent of the total. IT spending stabilized in 2004 and will remain stable in 2005. Fitch Ratings expects "mid-single digit" growth in hardware and software spending based on market indications and trends. For more analysis, see:
Fitch Outlook: Stable IT Spending Drives Credit Improvement,
Fitch Ratings Press Release (Dec. 9, 2004). Compare:
Communications
Networks Continue to Show Strong Growth According to the November Release of the Wendover-Global Insight IT Spending Index,
Global Insight
Press Release (Dec. 13, 2004).
*Prediction:
Even with the gains and stabilization in IT, obtaining financing opportunities in the maturing, cyclical sector will continue to take persistence, knowledgeable sourcing and specialized knowledge to win and close deals in 2005.
Commercial Aircraft.
Despite strong aircraft orders in November 2004 (up
1.2% to a seasonally adjusted $377.42 billion according to the Commerce Department), the legacy carriers faced another year of financial turmoil in 2004, fueled in part by high fuel prices and domestic overcapacity. Because high fuel prices and intense competition from discount airlines persist, in 2005 the major U.S. legacy carriers and some of the rapidly growing discounters will continue to face a difficult financial position. With two of the seven largest U.S. carriers (United and US Airways) already operating under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and a third (Delta) still in financial distress, Fitch Ratings believes that structural change in the airline industry may occur in 2005.
Partially excerpted from:
Fitch: Overcapacity & Fuel Prices Cloud U.S. Airlines' Outlook,
Fitch Ratings Press Release (Dec. 2, 2004). Such a change may have already started with Delta’s recent simplification of fares.
*Prediction: Lessors and lenders are likely to remain wary, at best, of providing funding to commercial airlines, and the volume of deals will likely be low in 2005
relative to funding capability in the market, as few, if any, good credit deals will be deemed to exist by lessors or lenders. Discounters will continue to gain on the majors in operations and completed financings. See:
Major U.S. Airlines Struggle as Discounters Carve Up Their Markets, Business Leasing News (Aug. 2004).
Health Care.
According to the results of the first annual
CIT Healthcare Industry Overview
released by CIT Healthcare Finance, "the healthcare delivery system is dynamic, growing and increasingly complex." Balance sheets are strong and patient volume is on an upswing. Specialty healthcare organizations expect to increase capital spending as they strive to offer improved technology and new equipment to enhance patient care.
*Prediction: This area continues to offer strong growth potential for lessors and lenders who target the highest growth parts of healthcare, understand the business and provide first-rate service to specialized healthcare organizations. Healthcare providers will likely focus on new and replacement technology assets. See:
Hospitals Focus on Technology as Capital Spending Ramps Up by David G. Mayer, Business Leasing News (June 2004).
Rail Equipment.
Railroads added capacity in 2004 to improve operational efficiency and customer service. Capacity is expected to continue to remain fairly tight relative to demand in 2005. Having learned from their past mistakes, railroads will take a measured approach to capacity growth. Fitch Ratings expects them to add just enough capacity to improve their operational integrity. See:
Fitch: Healthy Economy Should Fuel U.S. Rail Performance in 2005,
Fitch Ratings (Dec. 7, 2004).
*Prediction: Volume and revenue from railroad operations should continue to be strong in 2005. However, the cautious approach of railroads to the possibility of slower growth of the U.S. economy could throttle potential growth of traditional leasing and financing of rail equipment.
Heavy Trucks. Demand for Class 8 heavy trucks finished 2004 on a high note, propelled by pent-up replacement demand and solid gains in key truck-buying markets. The trucking industry also experienced a dramatic improvement in motor-carrier freight volumes. Bonus depreciation may have pushed some sales into 2004, but 2005 back orders remain substantial. See: The Recovery in
U.S Heavy Trucks Rolls Merrily Along by Ken Kremar,
Global Insight (Dec. 2004)
*Prediction: The good results should keep rolling in 2005 and 2006 as carriers continue to replace older units, prepare for greater environmental regulation of diesel engines and expand trucking capacity.
The world
economy and the market to acquire, lease and finance capital assets present a
daunting level of complexity and diversity for the financial services industry.
While no one has a crystal ball for business prospects in 2005, the likely
growth in the economy, though not robust, should provide substantial
opportunities to find and close a relatively high volume of transactions
(compared to 2004) for astute players in the respective market segments and
asset types.

2.
FAA Issues Final
Rules to Implement the Cape Town Convention
A new era in international aircraft financing should soon begin. Three months after the eighth country ratifies the
Cape Town Convention (Treaty) and formally deposits its instruments of ratification, the Cape Town Convention will "enter into force" along with the related aircraft protocol. The Treaty will arguably provide greater security and certainty to those who finance and lease aircraft (including helicopters) and aircraft engine worldwide by establishing an International Registry for all aircraft and engine financing information.
The United States
deposited its instruments of ratification on October 28, 2004. On January 3, 2005, the Federal Aviation Administration published the
final rule (Docket No. FAA-2004-19944) implementing the Treaty, as required by the
Cape Town Treaty Implementation Act of 2004, Public Law 108-297 (H.R. 4226), Aug. 9, 2004. The revisions to 14 C.F.R. Parts 47 and 49 implementing the Treaty announced in the January 3, 2005 Federal Register notice are effective immediately upon the Treaty’s entry into force.
Congress designated the FAA Aircraft Registry as the U.S. entry point to the International Registry relating to U.S. civil aircraft for which a U.S. identification has been assigned (but only for notices of prospective sales, assignments, and interests) and aircraft engines. Under the Treaty, priority is established by the first in time to file an interest in aircraft and engines.
Parties with recordable interests in U.S. registered aircraft and equipment will continue to file documents with the FAA Aircraft Registry, but they will be required only to file electronic notices of such interests with the International Registry.
*Technical Point: The final rule explains that a person may obtain a unique authorization code from the FAA Registry, which is to be used to send information electronically to the International Registry, simply by filing the FAA Entry Point Filing Form—International Registry, AC Form 8050-135, and any recordable documents with the FAA Aircraft Registry. Party name, a description of the collateral, and the type of interest must be provided, along with the submitter’s name, address and telephone number. The party name(s), collateral description(s) and the authorization code will be entered into the FAA Aircraft Registry database, to allow an interested party to determine if an authorization code has been issued, and then to check the International Registry to determine if an interest has been registered there. AC Form 8050-135 must first receive approval from OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act before it may be used to enter registration information.
To conform to the Treaty, the FAA has made other revisions to Parts 47 and 49. The rule excepts an irrevocable deregistration and export request authorization prepared under the terms of the Treaty from the requirement that a corporation file a copy of the Board authorization in connection with filing a request for registration or cancellation. For aircraft last previously registered in a foreign country in which the Treaty is in effect, the rule requires the owner to submit evidence satisfactory to the FAA that all interests ranking in priority have been discharged or that they have consented to deregistration and export. The same evidentiary showing is required for an application to cancel a U.S. aircraft registration certificate for purposes of export of an aircraft subject to the Treaty. The regulations also lower the aircraft engine horsepower threshold from 750 to 550 for eligibility for recording of conveyances affecting title to specifically identified aircraft engines.
*Tip: You should closely review all filing required under the Treaty for new and existing transactions and address them as seriously as you do filings at the FAA.
For the status on the Treaty and Protocol to the Convention on International
Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment, see:
Treaty Status.
Thanks to my colleague,
Greg Walden, former Chief Counsel of the FAA, for contributing this article.

3. Intercreditor Agreements: How Lenders Share and Negotiate Rights in Collateral
Different types of liens arise in complex financing transactions and leases. Borrowers or lessees (Borrowers) often request that their lenders or lessors (Lenders) permit another Lender or seller to have liens on the Borrower’s assets, which are also subject to the first Lender’s transaction. Intercreditor or subordination agreements (Intercreditor Agreements) establish the rights and priorities of secured parties to same or different collateral. Because these agreements affect the degree of risk a Lender accepts and the pricing of its credit accommodation, Intercreditor Agreements tend to involve extensive negotiation by the Lenders.
*Terms to Know: Intercreditor and subordination agreements operate in a similar fashion. Each agreement sets forth the respective rights and remedies of the Lenders with respect to specified collateral. However, to be a bit more precise, a "subordination agreement" may refer to an arrangement that sets the priority of rights to payment of debts and other obligations to Lenders. If a creditor agrees to be paid second, the creditor is "subordinated" to the creditor who is entitled to be paid first. By comparison to subordination agreements, "intercreditor agreements" principally control rights to liens in collateral. To distinguish the parties in these arrangements and their particular rights, the Lenders with the first priority may be called the "senior creditors" or "senior lienholders" while the other Lenders with secondary or lesser priority rights may be called "junior creditors" or "junior lienholders."
Intercreditor Agreements may be used in a wide variety of transactions by and among different types of creditors. A lessor may enter into a subordination or intercreditor agreement, just as various secured lenders may do so. See examples of an
intercreditor term sheet (affecting senior creditors in power project) and an
intercreditor agreement
(affecting mezzanine and senior debt lenders in a securitization transaction).
*Tip: Secured creditors with competing "senior" claims (claims with first priority over other claims) often prefer to sign an "intercreditor agreement" (rather than sign a "subordination agreement") because such
naming more effectively describes their positions.
Different Rights in Separate Collateral
Lenders who provide credit to a Borrower against accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and real estate can have entirely separate collateral or share the same collateral. Intercreditor Agreements serve an important function in both situations where Lenders have liens on separate collateral. An Intercreditor Agreement can:
the assets that collateralize each loan. The agreement would also set the priority of the Lenders to proceeds of the collateral (cash or non-cash consideration). By clearly setting out collateral rights in an Intercreditor Agreement, one Lender should not be able to "convert" to its own collateral any portion of the other Lender’s collateral.
Include
standstill provisions. Such a standstill provision can provide time for the Borrower to recover from a "downturn" in its business, or give the other lienholder time to enforce its remedies on its priority collateral.
*Term to Know: A "standstill" provision is an agreement by one creditor not to take certain actions (such as collecting the debt or foreclosing on collateral) for a certain period of time, or until the other creditor’s debt is paid off.
access to the Borrower’s property so the Lenders can inspect their collateral, review the books and records regarding the collateral (such as equipment maintenance status) and, after default, conduct a foreclosure sale of their collateral at the Borrower’s location or move the collateral to a different location.
*Tip: If a Borrower leases property or otherwise does not own the property outright, the Lender should obtain a landlord waiver or similar rights from the landlord, real estate lender (if the property is encumbered) and other third parties if to assure access and other rights.
Different Rights in Shared Collateral
What is the most basic term of an Intercreditor Agreement between creditors with liens on shared collateral? It is the provision that establishes lien priority to the collateral, regardless of when or how the lenders perfect their respective liens under applicable laws. For example, the Lender who files first under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to perfect its security interest in equipment should have the first priority, perfected security interest. However, an Intercreditor Agreement can shift the priority rights between creditors to the equipment and proceeds of the equipment to a creditor that files its UCC financing statement second (or later) in time.
These types of agreements also support the relative rights of the parties.
The "junior" lienholder will often not have any say in the sale or release of the collateral. If the "senior" Lender releases its lien, the "junior" Lender must usually release its lien also. If the junior Lender does not do so when required by the senior Lender, the senior lienholder may request the authority to do so on behalf of the junior lienholder.
Senior Mistakes Don’t Matter.
The first lienholder should also negotiate a provision that its lien will be valid despite any mistake or other action that invalidates the first lien such as a rejected UCC filing.
Proceeds Turnover by Junior.
As a complement to such a provision, the junior Lender should agree to turn over any proceeds it obtains from its second (subordinated) lien unless and until the first lien is paid in full.
*Tip: The junior lienholder usually will not object to such a provision. The junior lienholder is in no worse position than it would have been had the senior lienholder directly received the proceeds.
General Restrictions for All Collateral
Certain provisions in Intercreditor Agreements tend to apply to shared and separate collateral. The concept behind most provisions is to assure that the Lenders obtain the rights they bargained for that justify their pricing of the transaction (fees, interest rate and equity interests). The senior lender may provide less costly financing because of its priority rights to collateral. By contrast, a junior Lender may require equity or other rights, including a higher interest rate, to accept the subordinate position. A few important provisions that frequently appear in Intercreditor Agreements include:
The junior Lender should agree not challenge the existence or priority of the senior creditor’s liens or debt.
Debtor Bankruptcy Irrelevant.
Priority vis-à-vis the senior and junior Lenders should be established irrespective of whether a bankruptcy court subordinates one party’s claim in a bankruptcy court. Further, the Intercreditor Agreement should provide that the subordination and priority provisions, as well as the remainder of the document, should be reinstated if, and to the extent, a payment to a creditor is set aside or must be returned in a bankruptcy proceeding.
No Amendments. Senior
Lenders should include provisions that the other Lender will not amend its documents with the Borrower without the senior lender’s consent. For example, a junior Lender should agree that it cannot add any collateral, increase its interest rate or alter the timing or amount of other payments without the prior written consent of the senior Lender. To support its agreements, senior Lender should usually request waivers by a "junior" Lender of its rights to object to, or assert claims, or objections to actions, by the senior Lender with regard to rights to cash collateral, approving a plan in bankruptcy, voting a claim and providing debtor-in-possession financing.
Intercreditor Agreements Enforceable
Courts generally enforce Intercreditor Agreements, including in a bankruptcy involving a Borrower. Section 510(a) of the federal Bankruptcy Code provides that subordination agreements (the same applies to Intercreditor Agreements) are enforceable to the same extent they are enforceable under applicable non-bankruptcy law (generally state law selected by the parties). The subordination of liens among creditors is also specifically permitted by Section 9-339 of the UCC.
Though state contract law is the often final authority, Intercreditor Agreements are usually enforced according to their terms. See: In re General Homes Corp., 134 B.R. 853, 864 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1991) ("valid contractual subordination agreements have been uniformly enforced according to their terms by bankruptcy courts without proof of reliance by senior claimants"). The terms of Intercreditor Agreements are upheld unless the provisions thereof are unclear or ambiguous. In re Hinderliter Industries, Inc., 228 B.R. 848, 853 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1999).
Conclusion
Intercreditor Agreements play a very important part of financings with any Borrower whose assets also secure obligations to more than one creditor. The rights and obligations to different secured creditors can be tailored to fit each unique set of circumstances and credit arrangements. If a dispute arises and the Lenders find themselves in litigation, the courts will generally enforce their Intercreditor Agreement, making their careful negotiation of the provisions well worth their effort.
Thanks to
Scott C. Wallace, a partner in the Business Transactions Group in the Dallas office of Patton Boggs LLP. This article is a revision of an article written by Scott and published in "Tailored to Fit: Defining Rights & Priorities with Intercreditor Agreements," ABF Journal (Oct. 2004), pages 78-80.

4.
Fitch Ratings Issues a Stable Outlook for U.S. Commercial Finance and Leasing Sectors
Fitch Ratings recently published its
Ratings Outlook for U.S. commercial finance and leasing companies, taking into account the "stronger than expected rebound in the U.S. economy." It projected rise in GDP of 3.3 percent (compared to 3 percent by Global Insight in
Article 1) and a rise in federal funds rate to 3 percent (compared 3.5 percent by Global Insight in
Article 1) in 2005. It considered twenty-six individual rating actions during 2004 with a majority being positive. Looking into 2005, Fitch Ratings expects that a majority of its rating actions will affirm existing ratings of leasing and finance companies. Overall, its current and expected 2005 ratings maintain "Stable Outlooks" on the commercial finance and leasing sectors. For more on issues considered in these ratings, see:
Fitch: Outlook Stable for U.S. Commercial Finance & Leasing Sector; Subsector Outlook Initiated (Dec. 28, 2004).
Fitch Ratings also initiated and reviewed several "subsectors" that impact its outlook. For example, it said that China would have another robust year in 2005, meriting a positive rating for operating lessors there who, it expects, will be able to raise rents selectively in 2005 on "hard assets." Rising interest rates will not be viewed negatively (as Fitch Ratings suggests is generally the case); rather, Fitch Ratings expects income of financing entities and lessors to rise modestly, despite potential downward pressure on loan and lease margins, as a result of the ability of finance and leasing companies to pass on higher rates to customers and to maintain lower leverage than banks. Fitch Ratings also evaluated potential merger and acquisition activity (expected to be moderate) and the effect of Basel II (which remains unclear). See:
As Basel II Advances, Impact on Leasing Remains Unclear,
Business Leasing News (June 2004).
Although the financial services section ratings should remain stable in 2005, lessors and lenders can still work to achieve more positive ratings. Perhaps with strong earnings in the financial services sector, the ratings and earnings will rise together.
*Tip:
"Fitch Ratings 2005 Review and Outlooks" provides forward-looking analysis and trends from industry and credit rating perspectives. Categorically, Fitch Ratings covers and updates early in 2005
Corporate Finance,
Financial Institutions & Insurance and
Structured Finance areas, which you can use in analyzing various industries and their potential for 2005. See:
Fitch 2005 Outlooks.

5. Leasing 101:
What is a
"Wire Transfer"?
According to
investorwords.com a wire transfer is an electronic transfer of funds, such as one that is made over the Federal Reserve Wire Network. Often referred to as a transfer of "good funds" or even "cash," hundreds of thousands of these transfers occur each day to close a myriad of transactions. The U.S. Department of the Treasury refers to a wire transfer more formally as an "electronic funds transfer" or EFT. An EFT is a transfer of money initiated through electronic terminal, automated teller machine, computer, telephone, or magnetic tape.
A recent case,
TME Enterprises Inc. et al. v. Norwest Corporation, Calif. Ct. App. No. B164022 (certified for partial publication only, Dec. 9, 2004), dealt with an alleged fraud related to an incoming bank wire transfer. The court ruled "…a bank accepting an incoming wire transfer of funds that specifies both an account number and a named beneficiary may rely on the account number even if the named beneficiary does not hold the account identified by the designated number…."
This ruling is important for two reasons. First, it frees banks to rely on account numbers only and continue the rapid and automated flow of wire transfers each day without having to match up beneficiaries named in the wire instructions with the name appearing on the numbered account. In the TME case, the beneficiary who actually received the wire transfer was not the person to whom the wiring party wanted to send his money. The beneficiary was a wrong recipient in an alleged investment transaction, but the sender used the right wire transfer number on which the bank relied. Second, the ruling underscores the importance in transactions to confirm, through due diligence, that when you wire transfer, you confirm that the wire account matches the name of the beneficiary to whom you intend to wire your funds.
*Tip: Banks cannot blindly rely on the account number. They will be accountable if they have actual knowledge of the inconsistency between the named beneficiary on the account and the beneficiary named on the wire transfer instruction. In this regard, the TME court further stated that the receiving bank is protected "so long as the bank does not have actual knowledge of that inconsistency; that actual knowledge of such an inconsistency does not exist unless bank personnel handling the transaction are aware that the name of the owner of the account number designated in the wire bears no resemblance to, and has nothing in common with, the named beneficiary…".
For the statutory aspects of the TME case, see: Section 4A-207 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), California
UCC Section 11207. Also see:
Subpart B of the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation J (12 C.F.R.§§210.25-210.32 (2004) (Regulation J), which incorporates Article 4A (12 C.F.R. §210.25(b)) and which governs wire transfers through the Fedwire system. The Fedwire system is the funds transfer system owned and operated by the Federal Reserve Bank used for the transmission and settlement of payment orders governed by Regulation J. (12 C.F.R. §210.26(e).)

6.
Reader Feedback
Most months BLN receives comments from you, the readers. Thanks for your input. This section will be the place where we share readers views about BLN. Here are this month’s comments:
O ne reader e-mailed:
"As always, thank you for keeping me on the distribution list for Business Leasing News. I really enjoy reading it and believe it is the best publication in the industry. I was going through my archive and noticed that I was missing a few editions dating back to the first issue in February 2002 (or at least I thought it was). I would love to get them if they are available. I am missing July and August 2003 as well as October and December of 2004…. I hope you have a nice holiday season."
Another reader, an extremely knowledgeable finance/creditors
rights lawyer, sent holiday greetings with this message:
"David, Greeting with joy and good wishes. I enjoy receiving Business Leasing News…. Thank you for including me on your distribution list."
Thanks for your continued flow of kind remarks about BLN. Please note that you may find all past issues on
BLN’s Web Page. Check it out, and feel free to e-mail or call me with any comments you may have on any article you read in BLN.

8.
About Patton Boggs LLP and My Law Practice; Recent Publications
About Patton Boggs LLP and My Law Practice
I am a member of the Patton Boggs LLP Business Transactions Group in our Dallas office. Patton Boggs LLP is a law firm of more than 400 lawyers located in five offices in the United States and internationally in Doha, Qatar. The firm has extensive capabilities in over 50 distinct areas of legal practice that include leasing, secured transactions, personal property financing, corporate finance, syndications, power project regulatory, development and finance disciplines, mezzanine financing, bankruptcy, real estate, public policy, litigation, intellectual property and technology law, and much more.
The leasing and secured transaction practices regularly involve the buying, selling, financing and leasing of real and personal property of all kinds, including business aircraft, energy, facility, production, power plant, technology and health care assets. We also structure, negotiate and close secured transactions of all kinds, securitizations, tax-exempt and federal leasing arrangements, and corporate and portfolio acquisitions, among a full range of financing and acquisition transactions. Despite the improving economy, we continue to assist our clients with troubled deals and bankruptcies, including repossessions, lift stay actions, true lease contests, deficiency litigation, workouts and forbearance arrangements.
If I, or any other lawyer at Patton Boggs LLP can help you with your legal or business challenges, feel free to call me at (214) 758-1545 or e-mail me at
dmayer@pattonboggs.com for information about any of these areas or the many others available at Patton Boggs LLP, or to discuss anything I have written in Business Leasing News. We welcome the opportunity to build a relationship with you!
Recent Publications
Here are two feature articles published
this month:
Off Balance Sheet Leasing: Is the End in Sight?,
by David G. Mayer,
The Monitor, (Jan. 2005). Mindy Berman of 42 North Structured
Finance, Inc. commented on this article.
The Bright Side of Big Deficits, by
David G. Mayer,
Equipment Leasing Today (Jan. 2005) (on federal leasing). Michael
Guiffre of Patton Boggs LLP edited this article.

A Message From the Founder, David G. Mayer
BLN Starts Forth Year - Changes Made and Coming
This issue marks the beginning of the fourth year of publishing
Business Leasing News. Thanks for reading BLN. The list of subscribers grows every month.
The format of this issue has been changed from 2004. As 2005 progresses, you will see more changes in the appearance and content of BLN. You may also receive a questionnaire or other communications from me asking about your preferences, though many of you have expressed your approval of BLN as it is. Please take a few minutes to give me your thoughts. In 2005, we will strive for even more relevant, timely and market-sensitive legal and business topics with supporting research on a broader array of topics than leasing alone.
Starting in this issue, BLN will adopt a more flexible format. We may add or delete articles as the editing and topics dictate. I will provide training as the opportunity arises, but not refer to training in BLN.
The following changes will also occur starting with this issue:
I have been privileged to be a partner at Patton Boggs LLP for many years. It is a unique law firm full of high-quality people of tremendous capability. As this year progresses, you will see a theme unfold that began in 2004. That is, while BLN will bear my personal touch, we will make every effort to provide you with the content representing the best of the Patton Boggs LLP enterprise. Consistent with this enterprise theme, you will continue to see partners and some associates at Patton Boggs LLP contributing to BLN.
Broader Topics.
Although BLN uses the word "leasing" in its name, BLN has covered and will continue to cover a broader range of topics in leasing, lending, project finance and corporate finance, and many related topics such as tax matters, litigation, intellectual property, environmental law and creditors rights. While leasing is a specialized form of financing, it reaches an extensive range of topics such as real estate lending and development, facility financing, technology and intellectual property issues and health care finance.
Dropped Departments. Though "BLN Briefs" has been popular, we will drop that section in favor of producing at least one brief article in each issue on an important topic. "BLN Case & Comment" will appear periodically, but not monthly, to focus on the most important or interesting case law developments within the scope of BLN.
Remember: Your comments provide valuable insights into the most important topics of the day. Please feel free to communicate with me anytime, including ideas for articles or changes in BLN. We read all communications closely and appreciate receiving your ideas.
Thanks for reading BLN. Have a productive January and a great start this year.
Thanks to the BLN Staff
I extend a special thank you to my editors at Patton Boggs LLP for their comments on this edition,
Atwood Jeter, a real estate and wind power associate, Margaret Anderson and the rest of our great BLN staff, as well as our primary web site review partner, Jeff Turner. The technical team, consisting in part of George Barber and Winston Jackson, provides you the easy-to-use e-mail navigation and artistic appearance of BLN. Claire Campbell, our Chief Librarian in Dallas, provides research for BLN.
All the
best,
David
David G.
Mayer
Founder
Business Leasing News
Patton Boggs LLP
2001 Ross Avenue
Suite 3000
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 758-1545 (phone)
(214) 758-1550 (fax)
E-Mail:
dmayer@pattonboggs.com
© David G. Mayer 2005
NOTE: You may receive BLN from other people, which often occurs.
To SUBSCRIBE, change your
address or to change your e-mail format, simply
click here. To UNSUBSCRIBE,
simply e-mail
bln@pattonboggs.com with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line. To correspond with BLN, send your message to
bln@pattonboggs.com.
Thanks.
The "For
Dummies" part of my book,
Business Leasing For Dummies (BLFD)®, is a registered
trademark of
Wiley Publishing, Inc.
|
Disclaimer:
BLN
information is not intended to constitute, and is
not a substitute for, legal or other advice.
Comments, tips, warnings, predictions, etc. in BLN
provide general insights only. You should consult
appropriate counsel or other advisers, taking into
account your relevant circumstances and issues. The
Disclaimer linked here also shall be deemed to
apply to Business Leasing News in any e-mail
format. BLN does not endorse or validate information
contained in any link or research material used in
BLN. You should independently evaluate such
information or material. Readers are urged to print
information under linked pages as they are subject
to change over time. Comments made in BLN do not
represent the views of Patton Boggs LLP, but rather
those of David G. Mayer. BLN is intended to be a
personal letter and not commercial e-mail. The
primary purpose of BLN is to offer current, useful
and informative leasing and financing strategies,
trends and analysis, based on research and practical
experience. BLN is also intended to help you succeed
in your business or profession. While not intended,
BLN may in part be construed as an ADVERTISEMENT
under developing laws and rules. Should you ever
want to unsubscribe or OPT-OUT, simply e-mail
bln@pattonboggs.com with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
subject line and BLN will promptly remove
you from the subscriber list. Thanks for reading BLN. |
 |